Aidanix
Aidanix
From learning to earning, with AI
Startfree
AI News & UpdatesBusiness

The accusation of data concealment put OpenAI at risk in its battle with news media.

Aidanix Team3 minJuly 10, 2026
The accusation of data concealment put OpenAI at risk in its battle with news media.

OpenAI has faced serious sanction requests from news agencies. These organizations claim that OpenAI does not allow the review of millions of ChatGPT logs to find evidence of copyright infringement—evidence showing that some users have obtained paywalled content by prompting the chatbot.

This evidence is highly important for both parties and could determine OpenAI’s legal future; it could either convict the company of copyright violation or consider its chatbot technology a case of fair use. The New York Times and other plaintiffs, in an official request, accused OpenAI of concealment and providing false information to the court over recent years—an allegation that has posed a serious challenge to OpenAI’s defenses.

OpenAIنیویورک تایمزحق تألیفچت‌جی‌پی‌تیدرخواست تحریم
نظرات

هنوز نظری ثبت نشده — اولین نفر باش.

ChatGPT's lawyer was convicted in the New Mexico Supreme Court **Reasoning and explanation** - The Persian sentence “وکیل چت‌جی‌پی‌تی در دادگاه عالی نیومکزیکو محکوم شد” consists of: - “وکیل چت‌جی‌پی‌تی” → “ChatGPT’s lawyer” - “در دادگاه عالی نیومکزیکو” → “in the New Mexico Supreme Court” - “محکوم شد” → a passive past‑tense verb meaning “was convicted” or “was sentenced”. - The most direct English rendering of “محکوم شد” in a legal context is “was convicted”. Alternatives like “was sentenced” are possible, but “convicted” captures the notion of a judgment of guilt. - Combining the parts yields the natural English sentence: **“ChatGPT's lawyer was convicted in the New Mexico Supreme Court.”**Anthropic's $2 Trillion IPO: The Key Role of Foreign Trusts Under the MicroscopeNvidia acquires Hugging Face for $13 billion
Get motivated