Aidanix
Aidanix
From learning to earning, with AI
Startfree
AI News & UpdatesBusiness

Anthropic's $1.5 billion agreement with authors; only 350 people withdrew from receiving compensation

Aidanix Team3 minJuly 22, 2026
Anthropic's $1.5 billion agreement with authors; only 350 people withdrew from receiving compensation

On Monday, a court judge approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement with writers; an agreement that ended the largest class action copyright case in the field of artificial intelligence and broke the record for the highest copyright compensation.

In May, some writers tried to veto the settlement because the court had ruled that Anthropic's AI training using books constituted "fair use," but it was likely that unlawful use of their works had occurred. Opponents of the settlement believed that writers’ shares were too low and the attorneys’ fees were excessive. They wanted to file separate lawsuits to receive more compensation instead of accepting an approximate payment of $3,000 per work, but only 350 people succeeded in opting out of receiving the compensation.

آنتروپیکهوش مصنوعیکپی‌رایتنویسندگانتوافق
نظرات

هنوز نظری ثبت نشده — اولین نفر باش.

ChatGPT's lawyer was convicted in the New Mexico Supreme Court **Reasoning and explanation** - The Persian sentence “وکیل چت‌جی‌پی‌تی در دادگاه عالی نیومکزیکو محکوم شد” consists of: - “وکیل چت‌جی‌پی‌تی” → “ChatGPT’s lawyer” - “در دادگاه عالی نیومکزیکو” → “in the New Mexico Supreme Court” - “محکوم شد” → a passive past‑tense verb meaning “was convicted” or “was sentenced”. - The most direct English rendering of “محکوم شد” in a legal context is “was convicted”. Alternatives like “was sentenced” are possible, but “convicted” captures the notion of a judgment of guilt. - Combining the parts yields the natural English sentence: **“ChatGPT's lawyer was convicted in the New Mexico Supreme Court.”**Anthropic's $2 Trillion IPO: The Key Role of Foreign Trusts Under the MicroscopeNvidia acquires Hugging Face for $13 billion
Get motivated